Claims experience shapes the questions we ask, the evidence we connect and the systems we build. Our practitioners and engineers turn that knowledge into a method for establishing your entitlement.
Decades spent investigating construction disputes have taught our practitioners which questions matter. That experience shapes the specialist models we train, the analytical algorithms we build and the checks we apply.
This is what we mean by construction intelligence: specialist knowledge and software working on a shared record. Systems handle repetitive preparation and support analysis. Practitioners direct the investigation, challenge the findings and exercise judgement.
Bring connected inboxes and project files into a coherent record. Emails retain their dates, participants and source mailboxes, so an exchange can be followed across the people involved. Chronologies connect correspondence with programmes, costs and technical records; gaps and conflicting accounts remain visible.
Illustrative analysis using sample information.
Specialist algorithms compare programme revisions and examine cost records. Models trained for defined disciplines help interrogate the material. Our practitioners test the findings against causation, contract and source evidence, including material that challenges the claim.
Illustrative analysis using sample information.
A partner directs the work within the agreed appointment. Advice and reports explain the evidence, method, assumptions and limitations behind the conclusions. An appointed expert forms an independent opinion and remains responsible for it.
Illustrative analysis using sample information.
A programme trajectory report compares successive revisions and links the analysis to an evidence appendix. The reviewer can examine the recorded movement, its calculation and its source. That provides a basis for investigating delay; the expert must still assess cause, responsibility and entitlement.
Foresight's Proof page follows a fictional working week. It shows how messages considered together can reveal an issue for commercial review. The scenario explains the approach; its people, figures and outcomes are illustrative.
Explore the Foresight exampleA disputed instruction can expose a broken approval process. A final account can uncover months of unrecorded change. Our engineers work alongside the practitioners who investigate those failures to improve the systems behind the work.
Connect the event, its programme and cost effects, and the relevant contract provisions. Keep the supporting record close to the argument.
Bring emerging correspondence, programme movement and contract requirements to the people who need to assess their significance during delivery.
Link a drawing issue to its price, approval and completion record. Give the team a working process that preserves the information it will need later.
Start with one task, one project or one commercial team. Remove the repetitive work that gets in the way, so your people can apply their expertise where it matters.
Visit the project and follow the task with the people doing it. Find where information, time or commercial control is lost.
Agree the problem that matters, the people responsible and what a useful improvement would achieve.
Connect suitable existing tools, adapt our building blocks and build what is missing. Shape the system around the work.
Implement with the team, support adoption and check the result against the problem we set out to solve.
Illustrative review workflow using sample information.
Speak with a partner about the claim, project or commercial decision you need to address.